Gay marriage - Yes or No?

(11-09-2013 10:42 AM)Doyoy Wrote:  no. it's creepy. why should gay people be allowed if there is a penis and a vagina? WHY IS IT THERE? it's there so we can do our buissness and reproduce. gay people cannot reproduce. therefore they are not fit (biology lol). i'm saying it from a scientific view, like why would we just develop those parts if were not gonna use them for the right thing? plus it's just disgusting

Well I could say straight people were disgusting if I were gay...

The world has enough people and therefore we're not needing everyone to re-produce.

Besides, it only occurs in (4%?) of the population, therefore not having any effect on the ability to re-produce. Humans are built to have small variations, some people are left handed, some people are right handed. Some people are gay, some people are straight. People have sex because of that primal urge, it feels good. They have no need to re-produce. Even straight couples can choose not to re-produce.

Even other animals have homosexuals naturally, there is no laid down purpose of life to re-produce.

(11-09-2013 10:42 AM)Doyoy Wrote:  gay people cannot reproduce.

Gay people can't re-produce? hmm last time I checked women always have eggs and men have sperm. Therefore being able to re-produce whenever they want, but choose not to.

(11-08-2013 04:06 PM)p u r e Wrote:  I personally say no,and yes at the same time...
reasons why I think NO:
it should not be allowed, pure and simply because if it is allowed , it will give people wanting to marry other things animals\multiple people\robots\objects\other strange fetishes a way to try get it legalised. e.g: "you legalised gay marriage, so why cant I marry my dog (fake quotes)". I personally would find that really fucked up, and would not like that to ever happen.
reasons why I think yes:
I have nothing against gay people, nor do I really care about them getting married, if you love someone, I guess you love them...I just care about the effects of what legalising it would do, what other people who love other things would want after that, and if those things were not allowed, they would probably come up with something " 'ist " (I mean like rac"ist" sex"ist" etc...)

I have no intention of having a long discussion on this thread(replying heaps), and I am sorry if you don't understand what i'm saying, and i'm sorry if u do not like what i'm saying, its just my personal opinion.

p.s: sorry for any grammar\typos\stupid language, I am not great at English.
pp.s: I did vote "no" on the poll, if you were wondering who it was...

Being homosexual is NATURAL for the human race, being attracted to an animal is not (Some exceptions).You don't see rallies of dozens of thousands beastiality supporters trying to get it legalized even though gay marriage is legal in tons of places.